Research undertaken in 2021 generated an evidence base of just transition project characteristics and financing needs in South Africa. The Mpumalanga sample of 26 projects covered a range of economic diversification interventions. Projects with novel technology opportunities related to land, water rehabilitation and agricultural dominated the sample. All the projects were designed specifically to provide alternative employment and livelihood opportunities for workers and communities negatively affected by climate change and decarbonisation activities. The research showed that decarbonisation projects and associated investments were predominantly technology driven and sought as their core outcome reduced carbon emissions. Just transition projects and associated investments were people driven and sought as their core outcome improved socio-economic circumstances such as increased employment, new livelihood opportunities, skills development, improved access to services, and increased community asset ownership. Adaptation investments were more closely aligned to just transition outcomes than decarbonisation outcomes. Based on this research, it is argued that while the funding for decarbonisation and just transition investments are fundamentally interrelated, intertwined (and usually negotiated as a single package of funding),decarbonisation transactions and just transition transactions will chase different outcome measures resulting in different risk return profiles and different instruments anddeployment channels. It is therefore necessary to understand just transition finance supply and demand as a separate use of funds.
Press release: Unpacking the Just Transition in practice
Article:TIPS says broader, engaged development approaches needed to realise just transition projects (Marleny Arnoldi, Engineering News 25 March 2022)
Background
Development institutions tend to work according to an established framework, which helps practitioners and funders structure and plan their actions. This traditional model is based on empirical observations and on the ground experience of how project development and support policy work in practice. Key steps include:
The above cycle describes an idealised process, which differs from "real-life" processes. Steps are sometimes taken in parallel, and within one cycle not all steps may be covered completely. Recent examination of just transition projects and project development cycles suggest that the characteristics of such projects and their development may require an expanded or amended toolbox of actions, funding and sequencing.
For example, just transition projects require expanded participatory processes. Activities to support meaningful participation may thus need to be undertaken and funded to ensure participating workers or communities are able to engage both at a substantive as well as a process level. Another example is that environmental and green solutions sought by just transition project developers may require the inclusion of an expanded view of beneficiaries, given that environmental systems (such as water sheds) do not adhere to political or community boundaries. A final example is that just transition project developers will most likely require a range of funders to become involved in the project development cycle earlier than in traditional project finance. This idea of financial sector players making deals as opposed to buying deals will require additions to the existing project development and policy support toolbox.
The webinar investigates how different countries deal with these emerging issues. In particular, the following questions will be addressed: Does participatory planning call for different policy instruments and mechanisms as well as a different policy cycle? Do just transition projects require different financial support mechanisms and instruments at different times to traditional projects? How is the scope of just transition projects (especially those seeking to address environmental degradation) different from traditional projects and what instruments, mechanisms and policy support measures can be developed.
Outline of the event
Date: 24 March
Organisations: Trade & Industrial Policy Strategies (TIPS) and Wuppertal Institute für Climate, Environment and Energy (WI)
Enquiries: rozale@tips.org.za
The potential for biomass supply chains to provide alternative employment opportunities for people currently employed in coal trucking is vast. Side tipper trucker jobs are a low-hanging fruit as they are used both for the transportation of coal and the largest source of sustainable biomass in South Africa, namely invasive alien plants. Almost 75% of the current coal jobs could be directly transitioned to biomass transport via side tipper trucks. In addition, the biomass supply chains considered in this study could supply over 600 superlink driver jobs. About 480 superlink trucks would be required, which means some of the current coal side tipper trailers would have to be converted to flatbeds. More than 300 tanker driver jobs could furthermore be provided by the biomass supply chain.
This report is part of the Making Sense of Employment in South Africa's Just Energy Transition project. TIPS and the WWF South Africa, with the support of GIZ, are implementing an initiative to support policymaking for South Africa's just transition. This focuses on employment and the relevant challenges and opportunities in the country's just energy transition.
Download full report or read online
Exploring alternative options for coal truckers in a biomass supply chain - Highlights
The energy shift will result in a reduction in coal use, and thus a reduction in coal transportation, which currently provides employment for approximately 4000 truck drivers. Given South Africa's large biomass feedstock base and parallels in coal and biomass hauling operations, coal transporters may be able to find alternate livelihoods by hauling sustainable biomass for emerging green industries such as manufacturing sustainable aviation fuels (SAF). Establishing nationwide biomass supply chains could result in nearly 7 500 trucking jobs, over half of that (about 3 800) in coal producing regions, providing coal haulers an alternative option.
Almost 3 000 trucker jobs in the coal regions could be for side tipper truck drivers, meaning that almost 75% of the current coal hauling jobs could be directly transitioned to biomass hauling. In addition to the jobs saved in refueling and truck maintenance, biomass supply chains in coal districts could result in the creation of approximately 400 support jobs.
More details can be found in the infographic below, and the full report.
Dowload or view infographic online
.
South Africa continued to maintain a strong trade balance in the third quarter of 2021, with a surplus of R102 billion, down 11% from the third quarter of 2020. High mineral prices continue to be the main driver for the high surplus, although these prices are beginning to fall. In addition, exports to major trade partners such as the United States, Japan and the United Kingdom improved in the year to the third quarter of 2021, rising by 20%, 90% and 52% respectively. Exports reached the highest third quarter level in 2021 at R460 billion, from a previous high of R406 billion in the third quarter of 2020.
Daily Maverick - 23 February 2022 by Gaylor Montmasson-Clair, Lauren Hermanus, Muhammed Patel and Peta Wolpe
Engineering News - 17 February 2022 by Marleny Arnoldi
Business Day - 14 February 2022 by Neva Makgetla (TIPS Senior Economist)
Business Day - 8 February 2022 by Gray Maguire